Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
open-problems:family-of-constant-term-identities [2019/10/08 19:55]
romik
open-problems:family-of-constant-term-identities [2019/10/08 22:00] (current)
romik
Line 7: Line 7:
 A_n = \frac{1!4!7!\cdots (3n-2)!}{n!(n+1)!\cdots(2n-1)!}. A_n = \frac{1!4!7!\cdots (3n-2)!}{n!(n+1)!\cdots(2n-1)!}.
 $$ $$
-Define a polynomial $P_n(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n)$ by+Define a multivariate ​polynomial $P_n(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n)$ by
 $$ $$
 P_n(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n) = \prod_{1\le i<j\le n} (z_j-z_i)(1+z_j+z_i z_j) \prod_{j=2}^n (1+z_j). P_n(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n) = \prod_{1\le i<j\le n} (z_j-z_i)(1+z_j+z_i z_j) \prod_{j=2}^n (1+z_j).
 $$ $$
 Zinn-Justin and Di Francesco (2008) discovered and proved (with a little help from Zeilberger (2007)) the constant term identity Zinn-Justin and Di Francesco (2008) discovered and proved (with a little help from Zeilberger (2007)) the constant term identity
-\begin{equation} +$$ 
-[z_1^0 z_2^2 \cdots z_n^{2n-2}] P_n(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n) = A_n, \tag{*} +[z_1^0 z_2^2 \cdots z_n^{2n-2}] P_n(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n) = A_n,  \qquad\qquad (*) 
-\end{equation} +$$ 
-where the notation $[z_1^{j_1} \cdots z_n^{j_n}] Q(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n)$ refers to the coefficient in a multivariate polynomial $Q(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n)$ of the monomial $z_1^{j_1} \cdots z_n^{j_n}$.+where the notation $[z_1^{j_1} \cdots z_n^{j_n}] Q(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n)$ refers to the coefficientof ​the monomial $z_1^{j_1} \cdots z_n^{j_n}$  in a multivariate polynomial $Q(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n)$ .
  
-Romik (2014) discovered a family of identities generalizing (*). The idea is that, fixing $k\ge 1$ and a "​deformation"​ vector $(a_1,​\ldots,​a_k)$ of integers, we deform the polynomial $P_n(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n)$ by replacing it with the slightly modified version+Romik (2014) discovered a family of identities generalizing ​$(*)$. The idea is that, fixing $k\ge 1$ and a "​deformation"​ vector $(a_1,​\ldots,​a_k)$ of integers, we deform the polynomial $P_n(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n)$ by replacing it with the slightly modified version
 $$ $$
 P_{n,​k}(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n) = \prod_{1\le i<j\le n} (z_j-z_i)(1+z_j+z_i z_j) \prod_{j=k+2}^n (1+z_j) \qquad (n\ge k+2), P_{n,​k}(z_1,​\ldots,​z_n) = \prod_{1\le i<j\le n} (z_j-z_i)(1+z_j+z_i z_j) \prod_{j=k+2}^n (1+z_j) \qquad (n\ge k+2),
Line 31: Line 31:
 ===== Background and history ===== ===== Background and history =====
  
-1. The numbers ​$A_n$ are an important sequence of numbers. ​They enumerate alternating sign matrices, descending plane partitions and other classes of combinatorial objects. See this [[http://​oeis.org/​A005130|OEIS page]].+1. The number sequence ​$(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty = 1,​2,​7,​42,​429,​\ldotsis an important sequence of numbers. ​The $A_n$'​s ​enumerate alternating sign matrices, descending plane partitions and other classes of combinatorial objects. See this [[http://​oeis.org/​A005130|OEIS page]].
   ​   ​
 2. The [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Dyson_conjecture|Dyson conjecture]] was an early example of a nontrivial constant term identity. Many such identities have been discovered, but no systematic theory for proving them seems to have been developed (that by itself looks like an interesting,​ though not completely well-defined,​ open problem). 2. The [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Dyson_conjecture|Dyson conjecture]] was an early example of a nontrivial constant term identity. Many such identities have been discovered, but no systematic theory for proving them seems to have been developed (that by itself looks like an interesting,​ though not completely well-defined,​ open problem).
Line 42: Line 42:
   * D. Romik. [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1303.6341|Connectivity patterns in loop percolation I: the rationality phenomenon and constant term identities]]. //Commun. Math. Phys.// 330 (2014), 499–538.   * D. Romik. [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1303.6341|Connectivity patterns in loop percolation I: the rationality phenomenon and constant term identities]]. //Commun. Math. Phys.// 330 (2014), 499–538.
   * P. Zinn-Justin,​ P. Di Francesco. [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​math-ph/​0703015|Quantum Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equation, totally symmetric self-complementary plane partitions and alternating sign matrices.]] //Theor. Math. Phys.// 154 (2008), 331-348.   * P. Zinn-Justin,​ P. Di Francesco. [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​math-ph/​0703015|Quantum Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equation, totally symmetric self-complementary plane partitions and alternating sign matrices.]] //Theor. Math. Phys.// 154 (2008), 331-348.
 +  * D. Zeilberger. [[http://​sites.math.rutgers.edu/​~zeilberg/​mamarim/​mamarimhtml/​diFrancesco.html|Proof of a Conjecture of Philippe Di Francesco and Paul Zinn-Justin related to the qKZ equation and to Dave Robbins'​ Two Favorite Combinatorial Objects]]. Online paper (2008).